Grados de conversación y recursos de interacción comunicativa en Twitter
Resumen
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language change and digital media: a review of conceptions and evidence. In Coupland, N. y T. Kristiansen (eds.), Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe (pp. 2-15). Oslo: Novus.
Baron, N. S. (1984). Computer Mediated Communication as a Force in Language Change. Visible Language, 18 (2), pp. 118-141.
Baym, N. (1996). The Emergence of Community in Computer-Mediated Communication. En Jones, S. (ed.) Cybersociety: Computer Mediated Communication and Community (pp. 138-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Bays, H. (1998). Framing and face in Internet exchanges: A socio-cognitive approach. Linguistik Online, 1(1). Recuperado de http://www.linguistik-online.com/bays.htm
boyd, D., Golder, S., and Lotan (2010). Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. HICSS-43. IEEE: Kauai, HI, January 6, pp. 1-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2010.412
boyd, D. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics. Affordances, dynamics, and implications. En Papacharissi, Z. (ed.) A networked self. Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39-58). New York, London: Routledge.
boyd, D. y Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information. Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 662-679.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. En Goody, E. N. (Ed.) Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., y Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cherny, L. (1995). The Modal Complexity of Speech Events in a Social MUD. Electronic Journal of Communication, Vol. 5, n. 4.
Crystal, D. (2011). Internet Linguistics. London: Routledge.
De Moor, A. (2010). Conversations in Context: A Twitter Case for Social Media Systems Design. In I-SEMANTICS ‘10 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems, pp. 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1839707.1839744
Cunha, E., Magno G., Comarela, G., Almeida, V., Gonçalves, M. y Benevenuto, F. (2011). Analyzing the dynamic evolution of hashtags on twitter: a language-based approach. Proceedings of the Workshop on Language in Social Media (LSM 2011) (pp. 58-65).
Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (2013). El género de opinión. Los blogs. En Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (coord.), Imagen social y medios de comunicación (pp. 77-92). Madrid: Arco Libros.
Goffman, E. (1975). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and Responses. Language in Society, 5: 3, pp. 257-313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007156
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. En Cole, P. y Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E. y Nekrasova, T. (2010). Variation among blog text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In Mehler, A., Sharoff, S. y Santini, M. (eds.) Genres on the Web: Corpus Studies and Computational Models (pp. 303-322). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9178-9_14
Haase, M. et al. (1997). Internetkommunication und Sprachwandel. Sprachwandel durch Computer. Institut für semantische Informationsverarveitung, Universität Osnabrück.
Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4,4, pp. 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x
Herring, S. C. (2008). Language and the Internet. En Donsbach, W. (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 2640-2645). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Honeycutt, C. y Herring, S. (2009). Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration in Twitter. Proceedings 42nd HICSS, IEEE Press, pp. 1-10.
Hu, Y., Talamadupula, K. y Kambhampati, S. (2013). Dude, srsly?: The surprisingly formal nature of twitter’s language. Proceedings of ICWSM, pp. 244-253.
Huang, J., Thornton, K. M. y Efthimiadis, E. N. (2010). Conversational Tagging in Twitter. HT ‘10 Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pp. 173-178.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1810617.1810647
Huberman, B., Romero, D. y Wu, F. (2009). Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope. First Monday. 14(1).
Java, A., Song, X., Finn, T. y Tseng, B. (2007). Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proceedings Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop, ACM Press, pp. 56-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1348549.1348556
Kelly, R. (2009). Twitter Study Reveals Interesting Results About Usage. San Antonio: PA.
Lakoff, G. (1973). Humanistic Linguistics. En Dineen, F.P. (Ed.) Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1987). Minimization and conversational inference. En Bertuccelli Papi, M. y Verschueren, J. (Eds.) The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference (pp. 61-129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.10lev
Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing. En Goofman E., ed. by P. Drew, A. Wootton (pp. 161-227). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mancera Rueda, A. (2014). Cortesía en 140 caracteres: interacciones en Twitter entre periodistas y prosumidores. Revista de Filología, núm. 32, pp. 163-181.
Pano Alamán, A. y Mancera Rueda, A. (2014). La “conversación” en Twitter: las unidades discursivas y el uso de marcadores interactivos en los intercambios con parlamentarios españoles en esta red social. Estudios de Lingüística del Español, 35.1, pp. 234-268.
Reddy, S., Stanford, J. y Zhong, J. A. (2014). Twitter-Based Study of Newly Formed Clippings in American English. 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Dialect Society, January 4, Minneapolis.
Rossi, L. y Magnani, M. (2014). Conversation Practices and Network Structure in Twitter. Proceedings of the Sixth International AAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 563-566). Palo Alto, CA: The AAAI Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17710/tep.2016.2.1.7neguerrerocontreras
Copyright (c) 2016 Noemí Elisa Guerrero Contreras
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
TEP | Textos en Proceso | ISSN 2001-967X | oa.edice.org | tep@edice.org
Una publicación del Programa EDICE. Utiliza los servicios de CrossRef, Google Scholar y DOAJ para su indexación internacional, con normas OAI validadas.